For many New Yorkers, the biggest challenge of city living isn’t the subway at rush hour or late nights at the office; it’s finding a place to live.

For many New Yorkers, the biggest challenge of city living isn’t the subway at rush hour or late nights at the office; it’s finding a place to live.
As New York’s single population grows, accounting for 1 in 3 households across the five boroughs, the need for single-room occupancy housing (SRO) has grown along with it — and developers are taking notice.
Although traditional SRO housing fell out of favor in recent decades, replaced by studio and 1-bedroom apartments that property owners viewed as more lucrative, single-room housing is staging a comeback.
Rebranded as “co-living,” a wave of modern, flexible properties are hitting the market, leveraging a growing appetite for amenities over space access to a community, while turning a higher profit for property owners.
The diversity of co-living options is vast, ranging from apartment-style buildings with indoor pools and fitness suites, to charming brownstones offering a homey atmosphere and highly curated experience. This diversity has made running a co-living business a lucrative option for more than just large-scale developers. By focusing on a specific niche, townhouse owners can profit, too.
In this guide, we’ll look at the re-emergence of SRO housing in New York and how property owners can leverage this growing trend.
Defined simply as any housing that gives tenants private room on an individual lease, SROs have varied widely. Although some suites offer a private bathroom, tenants often rent a single room, sharing the bathroom, kitchen and other communal spaces.
If this sounds a lot like sharing an apartment with roommates, it’s because the living experience isn’t all that different for tenants — with an important caveat. SROs allow tenants to rent individual rooms without shouldering the risk of the entire lease amount should other tenants fail to pay their share. Under a traditional lease, each roommate agrees to bear responsibility for the full amount, which can make leases inflexible and expensive.
As recently as the 1960s, single-room occupancy housing dominated the New York market between residence hotels, boarding houses and communal apartments. Ironically, as the demand for SRO housing has risen, the supply has all but disappeared.
Today, SROs are a fraction of the housing stock, according to CUNY Law Review, a trend that has fueled the trend toward roommates. Facing sharply rising rents, stagnating wages and crushing student loans, even well-established professionals cannot afford studio and 1-bedroom apartments in desirable neighborhoods.
Societal norms are also driving greater demand for SRO housing. With more and more New Yorkers choosing to remain single, splitting a lease with roommates often feels like the only option, even if it’s less than desirable.
This disconnect between what New Yorkers want from their housing and the type of housing currently available has led to significant opportunities in the co-living space, with upstarts like Ollie, Common and Roomrs driving massive growth.
What many New Yorkers desire, even as they seek privacy and an individual lease, is a stress-free home life and a sense of community — the keys to success for many emerging co-living companies. Conveniences like housekeeping, toiletries, WiFi and premium cable packages, coupled with the flexibility to participate in communal activities without having to fight over the cable bill, have made co-living a wildly popular alternative to roommates. Some spaces have seen waitlists for 100 available rooms hit more than 10,000 applicants.
With more privacy, greater flexibility, lower overall rents and more amenities, it’s clear how tenants are winning in the shift toward co-living — but what about property owners?
For landlords and developers, the co-living trend means more units per building and greater tenant demand, translating to a higher rent per square foot and a deeper pool of qualified applicants. This is particularly true at luxury buildings, where developers have struggled to find enough high earners to fill studios and single bedrooms, and at townhouses, where landlords have more legal options to maximize their ROI without the wear and tear or questionable legal status of short-term stays. Indeed, many successful co-living spaces, like Outpost Club and Dwell, started out in single-family townhouses, where tenants can enjoy a homey, communal vibe with a feeling of privacy.
Townhouse owners in emerging neighborhoods like Crown Heights, Bushwick and East Harlem are finding particular success, although I see even greater opportunities throughout greater Harlem, where the need for SRO housing is largely underserved.
Townhouse owners in Harlem can leverage the co-living trend by focusing on curation and adapting their properties to fit the needs of single adults who want privacy and amenities. Low interest rates have given existing homeowners favorable conditions to remodel.
One of the greatest advantages of starting a co-living business is a low barrier to entry, but it pays to seek out expert advice. Here are a few tips for a smooth and successful launch:
Schedule a call with me here if you have any interest in obtaining a complimentary valuation for your home or buyer consultation.
Connect with me on Linkedin or Instagram for more information on the townhouse and multifamily market.
Authored by: Stanley Montfort
To see townhouse inventory, click here.
Reach out for buyer representation, listing strategy, or a confidential valuation with Stanley Montfort.